2019-07-01　人氣：252By amending the claims, the distinctive technical features between the present application and the citations are emphasized to persuade the examiner.

 The examiner considers that the claims of the present application do not involve an inventive step in view of the citations, thus the present application is unpatentable. However, TJIP amends claim 1 to emphasize that the distinctive technical features of the amended claim 1 are different from the citations. Therefore, TJIP states that the technical features of the amended claim 1 in the reply letter, wherein the technical features of the amended claim 1 are not disclosed by the citations and the amended claim 1 has involved an inventive step, such that the examiner is persuaded and the patent of the present application is granted.